Loss of Himalayan Glaciers – Another Global Lie

The biggest scientific story of the decade or perhaps the century is the outrageous magnitude of the global warming lie.

It is not a story about climate at all; it is a story of the forensic pathology of human greed run wild.

The imminent disappearance of the Himalayan glaciers is the latest casualty of global warming true confession.

The dsappearance of Himalayan glaciers initially was a speculative comment, very cursory in nature, not a scientific finding at all, taken out of that context and blown into a global crisis by greedy international liars.

Or else it was a lie directly from a human scientist sinner. After all, elite scientists have been nailed cold subverting the peer review process; “fudging” scientific data; blackballing publication of competing ideas.

Now it, the forecasted disappearance of the glaciers of the Himalays, is all over, in the course of a few days.

The magnitude of the lie itself is nearly beyond belief; that it was practically undisputed and accepted widely among lay persons is another great wonder of civilization and human psychology.

Glaciers In Hunza Under Threat From Global Warming?

No Obi-wan; it is all a giant lie; maybe the biggest lie of our age.

[picapp align=”center” wrap=”false” link=”term=glaciers+himalayan&iid=950647″ src=”6/8/3/a/Glaciers_In_Hunza_550c.jpg?adImageId=9146089&imageId=950647″ width=”500″ height=”333″ /]

World Misled over Himalayan Glacier Meltdown

A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.

Two years ago the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a benchmark report that was claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming. A central claim was the world’s glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could vanish by 2035.

In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC’s 2007 report.

It has also emerged that the New Scientist report was itself based on a short telephone interview with Syed Hasnain, a little-known Indian scientist then based at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi.

Hasnain has since admitted that the claim was “speculation” and was not supported by any formal research. If confirmed it would be one of the most serious failures yet seen in climate research. The IPCC was set up precisely to ensure that world leaders had the best possible scientific advice on climate change.

Professor Murari Lal, who oversaw the chapter on glaciers in the IPCC report, said he would recommend that the claim about glaciers be dropped: “If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, than I will recommend that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments.”

The IPCC’s reliance on Hasnain’s 1999 interview has been highlighted by Fred Pearce, the journalist who carried out the original interview for the New Scientist. Pearce said he rang Hasnain in India in 1999 after spotting his claims in an Indian magazine. Pearce said: “Hasnain told me then that he was bringing a report containing those numbers to Britain. The report had not been peer reviewed or formally published in a scientific journal and it had no formal status so I reported his work on that basis.

“Since then I have obtained a copy and it does not say what Hasnain said. In other words it does not mention 2035 as a date by which any Himalayan glaciers will melt. However, he did make clear that his comments related only to part of the Himalayan glaciers. not the whole massif.”

The New Scientist report was apparently forgotten until 2005 when WWF cited it in a report called An Overview of Glaciers, Glacier Retreat, and Subsequent Impacts in Nepal, India and China. The report credited Hasnain’s 1999 interview with the New Scientist. But it was a campaigning report rather than an academic paper so it was not subjected to any formal scientific review. Despite this it rapidly became a key source for the IPCC when Lal and his colleagues came to write the section on the Himalayas.

When finally published, the IPCC report did give its source as the WWF study but went further, suggesting the likelihood of the glaciers melting was “very high”. The IPCC defines this as having a probability of greater than 90%.

The report read: “Glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate.”

However, glaciologists find such figures inherently ludicrous, pointing out that most Himalayan glaciers are hundreds of feet thick and could not melt fast enough to vanish by 2035 unless there was a huge global temperature rise. The maximum rate of decline in thickness seen in glaciers at the moment is 2-3 feet a year and most are far lower.

Story continues here

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. Yes specualation is dangerous. This includes speculation that global warming is a hoax. While there are people willing to believe anything, it is still prudent to consider the threats that may face humanity. As a country we face terrorism, floods, tsunamis, and earthquakes. As individuals we purchase life, health, and property insurance. I pray that everyday my friends and family and others will be safe. However, this does not mean that I am going to put my head in the sand.

    • Hope you have an extra $20K to turn over to government every year. Your cost to keep Earth cool will be at least that.

      But, it won’t keep Earth cool – and your real problem is staying warm.

      That’s what I think.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: